Comparitive Politics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Comparitive Politics - appointment ExampleIn Comparative Politics, there are two core approaches the area studies and the cross-national approach. The cross-national approach in Comparative Politics deals with the study of many nation-states with the purpose of addressing certain theoretical questions that apply broadly. In this approach, the tools apply in most cases involve empirical data subjected to quantitative analysis. The area studies method places more tenseness on in-depth analysis within a specific region or the borders of a particular country. With this approach, the requirement tools, in most cases, involves the researcher immersing himself into the culture and language of the region under study.It is important to study states because their mogul faces considerable threats from growing interconnections and interdependencies and international agreements and arrangements. These threats limit the ability of states to control their individual affairs. These threats inclu de multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations and bodies operating(a) on a global scale. This is evident from the rise of terrorism and other vices, which are not curtail to countries any more. However, states retain the power and responsibility to protect their citizens and undertake other national duties by sexual morality of having supreme power within their jurisdictions. States are still important, therefore forming the point of departure and focus for comparative approach to government and politics. Comparative Politics has six main approaches Institutionalism, Systems theory, Governance, Marxism, Structural functionalism, Institutionalism and Corporatism. Institutional analysis forms the al-Qaida of Comparative Politics (Caramani, 2).Comparative Politics is a science because it is guided by various theories (Caramani, 25). Alasdair MacIntyre premier raised the question of the possibility of Comparative Politics being a science. The deduction he provided i n his analysis was that there was